|
AT&T Receives FCC
Approval for Purchase of 700 MHz Wireless Spectrum from Qualcomm December 26, 2011
AT&T
has received all required regulatory approvals for AT&T’s acquisition of
spectrum from Qualcomm. AT&T is purchasing 700 MHz spectrum licenses
covering more than 300 million people for approximately $1.9 billion.
"This spectrum will help AT&T continue to deliver a world-class mobile
broadband experience to our customers," said Bob Quinn, senior vice
president-Federal Regulatory, AT&T. "We appreciate the FCC Chairman, the
Commissioners and their staff for completing its review before the
holidays.
"As spectrum is the lifeblood of the U.S. wireless industry, we are
pleased that the FCC did not reduce the spectrum screen, however, we
continue to believe any changes to the process by which it is allocated
should be subject to open and transparent public discussion and clear to
everyone with an interest in ensuring the health of our industry."
The companies expect to close the transaction in the coming days.
FCC Commissioner Mignon Clyburn
comented: "I concur with today’s decision to grant the applications to
transfer Qualcomm’s licenses and authorizations in the D and E Blocks of
the lower 700 MHz band to AT&T.
A number of parties, including consumer advocates and holders of
licenses in the A Block of the lower 700 MHz band, have made persuasive
arguments in opposition to this transaction. They contend, if the
Commission decides to approve the applications, that we should adopt an
interoperability condition that would require any AT&T device operating
on paired spectrum in the lower 700 MHz band, to operate on all paired
spectrum in that part of the band. This would mean that AT&T would have
to migrate from Band Class 17 devices, which only permit access to B
Block and C Block licenses in the lower 700 MHz band, to Band Class 12
devices, which permit access to A, B, and C Block licenses in this band.
The A Block licensees assert that the decision to split the lower 700
MHz in to Band Class 12 and Band Class 17, occurred after they acquired
their A Block spectrum in Auction No. 73 in 2008. The A Block licensees
also maintain that, as a result of this decision, the lower 700 MHz band
now enjoys the distinction of being the only historical mobile wireless
band in the United States without a unified band plan. They argue that
unified band plans are necessary to promote network deployment, industry
growth, and consumer choice because, without a common band plan, voice
and data roaming is not possible. They also argue that the lack of
interoperability in the lower 700 MHz band impedes voice and data
roaming, and some of these parties were willing to accept a condition
that would require device interoperability to be implemented by the
beginning of 2013.
For me, the lack of interoperability in the 700 MHz band was the most
challenging issue in this proceeding. I am very concerned that the 700
MHz band, which holds so much promise because of its excellent
propagation characteristics, has become the only mobile wireless band
without a unified band plan. We have to make progress on this issue to
fully deliver on the promise of mobile broadband for all Americans. I
agree with most of these arguments from the A Block licensees and the
Order actually credits many of their issues. In fact, after finding that
this transaction results in spectrum concentration that raises the
potential for competitive harm, the Order finds it necessary to adopt a
“more circumscribed condition to ensure that AT&T does not use the
Qualcomm spectrum in a way that deprives other providers of the benefits
of the Commission’s roaming rules.” The Order also states “that the lack
of interoperability in the 700 MHz band raises important public interest
concerns.” In my opinion, this is an understatement. Without true
interoperability, consumers will not likely see the true potential that
the excellent propagation characteristics of the 700 MHz band could
offer. Lack of interoperability means fewer competitive options for
service providers offering 700 MHz devices and services. That, in turn,
means higher prices and fewer product choices for consumers.
For
these reasons, I would have preferred that the Order found that the lack
of interoperability is a merger specific issue that should be remedied
by an interoperability condition similar to the one that the A Block
licensees and other parties requested. But today, the policy priority
for me is the most efficient path possible for interoperability in the
lower 700 MHz band. In order to accomplish this, compromise among all
stakeholders will be necessary. I am heartened that Chairman Genachowski
has agreed to expeditiously conduct an interoperability proceeding next
year, and I thank him for this commitment. Although AT&T opposes
addressing interoperability standards in this proceeding, it has
voluntarily committed to not oppose its migration to Band Class 12 if
the FCC appropriately resolves interference issues with Channel 51 and
the E Block. I understand the advocates for interoperability across the
lower 700 MHz band would have preferred the Commission go further.
However, since the commitments I discussed are positive developments
towards interoperability, which likely would not have occurred without
this proceeding, I concur with today’s Order." |