|
Chester Wisniewski, Sophos: Despite
what you may think, IT security *is* your business
January 16, 2012
I often wonder if, early in my career, working for large, cold, faceless
corporate giants, I was wasting time fighting against all hope that I
could make a change in how seriously they took the security and
integrity of their IT systems.
Futile as it may have seemed, I wouldn't give up that experience for
anything. It provided a ton of useful insights that have allowed me to
see through their eyes and provide more salient arguments to effect
change.
One of the organizations I worked at had IT security issues on a daily
basis: viruses, lost devices, stolen data and intellectual property
walking off with recently dismissed employees.
I regularly attempted to draw management's attention to the problem, and
the fact that we had all of the software, manpower and will we needed to
fix it. All we had to do was adjust our attitude toward the problem.
The reply? "We aren't in the business of IT or security. We make
widgets. We maximize investor returns by buying, selling and trading
subsidiaries to create wealth."
Well, I have news for companies who adopt this attitude. It simply isn't
true anymore.
This same company spent millions of dollars monthly maintaining their
fleet of delivery trucks, the robots in their factories and even the
coffee machines in the breakroom.
We once had an outage due to a power failure at a critical IT facility
that cost the organization over $1 million an hour because robots needed
the computers at that facility to tell them what to make. When that's
the case, can you afford not to be an IT company?
In this day and age, for an organization to ignore IT security is
patently irresponsible. If you really feel that way, perhaps you should
take down your website, turn off the internet connection and live in a
world that matches your fantasy.
What prompted this rant? According to datalossdb.org's 2011 yearly
report more than 126 million personally identifiable records were
compromised in 369 incidents.

As most incidents go unreported,
those numbers are only the tip of the iceberg. In fact, most
jurisdictions don't require organizations to report incidents, so this
represents only those that are regulated and those that were "outed."
It is time to recognize that the internet is a utility, and your
computers are property that you have an *obligation* to properly
maintain for the safe operation of most businesses.
A perfect example of not learning or apparently caring about security
very much is Care2.com. While they have finally revised their password
reset process, they clearly have not embraced protecting your
information.
Care2.com was compromised in December 2010 and had over 17 million user
IDs and passwords stolen, all of which were stored in plain text. They
even offered to email you your password. Any organization that can
return existing passwords to a customer is not even trying to securely
store them.
I checked out their site today to determine if they learned any lessons
from the breach. While they will no longer send your password when you
attempt to reset (Good!), they let me choose a password of "password"
when I created my account.
Strangely, when I then tested out the password reset process it insisted
on an eight character password that had to contain a numeral (which
arguably lowers the entropy). Note that my prior password of "password"
clearly hadn't been held to this standard. Requiring password complexity
in only some circumstances and not others is pointless.

It is unclear if the passwords are
now securely stored, but it almost doesn't matter. Their web server
supports HTTPS, but as soon as you click a link like "Login" or "Join"
it reverts to an unencrypted connection.
Yes, everything you enter into the form fields, including your user ID,
birth date, password, and personal group preferences, like NAACP, GLBT
Rights, Pagans and Planned Parenthood, are transmitted in plain text and
easily intercepted on public WiFi.

Of course Care2.com proudly displays
the TRUSTe symbol to assure you they respect and protect your privacy. I
contacted TRUSTe for comment, but they have not yet returned my call.
On the other hand you have Stratfor. While they didn't learn from
others' mistakes, they took the site down until they could safely bring
it back online. George Friedman, their CEO, took full responsibility
even stating "That's not a justification. It's simply an explanation."
If you work for one of the companies with this malady, please speak up.
Make it an issue and don't let it be swept under a carpet. Make sure
your management is aware of what has happened to others in your industry
and make recommendations that can mitigate the risk.
While
Stratfor may have lost information on 850,000+ accounts, Care2 lost
almost 18 million and has still not embraced fixing the type of problems
that led to their compromise to begin with.
All of us have a role to play in a more secure internet and it's high
time we admit we have a problem and get on with fixing the issues as
quickly as possible.
If your company has customer information, takes credit cards or has
computers that use passwords then IT security is in fact your business.
Chester Wisniewski is a Senior Security Advisor at
Sophos Canada. He provides advice and insight into the latest threats
for security and IT professionals with the goal of providing clear
guidance on complex topics. You can follow Chester on Twitter as @chetwisniewski. |