|
Christopher Carr, MIT:
Humans could have originated on Mars - Search for Extra-Terrestrial
Genomes (SETG) Device May Prove It
December 29, 2011
Are
we all Martians? According to many planetary scientists, it's
conceivable that all life on Earth is descended from organisms that
originated on Mars and were carried here aboard meteorites. If that's
the case, an instrument being developed by researchers at MIT and
Harvard could provide the clinching evidence.
In order to detect signs of past or present life on Mars — if it is in
fact true that we're related — then a promising strategy would be to
search for DNA or RNA, and specifically for particular sequences of
these molecules that are nearly universal in all forms of terrestrial
life. That's the strategy being pursued by MIT research scientist
Christopher Carr and postdoctoral associate Clarissa Lui, working with
Maria Zuber, head of MIT's Department of Earth, Atmospheric and
Planetary Sciences (EAPS), and Gary Ruvkun, a molecular biologist at the
Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard University, who came up with
the instrument concept and put together the initial team. Lui presented
a summary of their proposed instrument, called the Search for
Extra-Terrestrial Genomes (SETG), at the IEEE Aerospace Conference this
month in Big Sky, Mont.
The idea is based on several facts that have now been well established.
First, in the early days of the solar system, the climates on Mars and
the Earth were much more similar than they are now, so life that took
hold on one planet could presumably have survived on the other. Second,
an estimated one billion tons of rock have traveled from Mars to Earth,
blasted loose by asteroid impacts and then traveling through
interplanetary space before striking Earth's surface. Third, microbes
have been shown to be capable of surviving the initial shock of such an
impact, and there is some evidence they could also survive the thousands
of years of transit through space before arriving at another planet.
So the various steps needed for life to have started on one planet and
spread to another are all plausible. Additionally, orbital dynamics show
that it's about 100 times easier for rocks to travel from Mars to Earth
than the other way. So if life got started there first, microbes could
have been carried here and we might all be its descendants.
So what?
If we are descendants from Mars, there might be important lessons to be
learned about our own biological origins by studying biochemistry on our
neighbor planet, where biological traces erased long ago here on Earth
might have been preserved in the Martian deep freeze.
The MIT researchers' device would take samples of Martian soil and
isolate any living microbes that might be present, or microbial remnants
(which can be preserved for about up to a million years and still
contain viable DNA), and separate out the genetic material in order to
use standard biochemical techniques to analyze their genetic sequences.
"It's a long shot," Carr concedes, "but if we go to Mars and find life
that's related to us, we could have originated on Mars. Or if it started
here, it could have been transferred to Mars." Either way, "we could be
related to life on Mars. So we should at least be looking for life on
Mars that's related to us."
Even a few years ago, that might have seemed like more of a long shot,
but recent Mars orbiter and rover missions have clearly shown that Mars
once had abundant water, and many of the conditions thought to be needed
to support life. And although the surface of Mars today is too cold and
dry to support known life forms, there is evidence that liquid water may
exist not far below the surface. "On Mars today, the best place to look
for life is in the subsurface," Carr says.
So the team has been developing a device that could take a sample of
Martian soil from below the surface — perhaps dredged up by a rover
equipped with a deep drill — and process it to separate out any possible
organisms, amplify their DNA or RNA using the same techniques used for
forensic DNA testing on Earth, and then use biochemical markers to
search for signs of particular, genetic sequences that are nearly
universal among all known life forms.
The researchers estimate that it could take two more years to complete
the design and testing of a prototype SETG device. Although the proposed
device has not yet been selected for any upcoming Mars mission, a future
mission with a lander or rover equipped with a drill could potentially
carry this life-detection instrument.
No instrument has been sent to Mars specifically to look for evidence of
life since NASA's twin Viking landers in 1976, which produced
tantalizing but ambiguous results. An instrument on the Mars Science
Lander to be launched in the fall will investigate chemistry relevant to
life. The instrument from the MIT-Harvard team directly addresses
Earth-like molecular biology.
Christopher
McKay, an astrobiologist at NASA-Ames Research Center in California who
specializes in research related to the possibility of life on Mars, says
this work is "very interesting and important." He says, "it is not
implausible that life on Mars will be related to life on Earth and
therefore share a common genetics. In any case it would be important to
test this hypothesis." But he adds that there is another motive for
doing this research as well: "From an astronaut health and safety point
of view and from a return-sample point of view, there is more to worry
about" if there are organisms closely related to us on Mars, since a
microbe that is similar is much more likely to be infectious to
terrestrial life forms than would a totally alien microbe — so it is
very important to be able to detect such life forms if they are present
on Mars. In addition, this method could also detect any biological
contamination on Mars that has been brought by spacecraft from Earth.
This kind of test is something we have the ability to do, he says, and
therefore, although such an experiment has not yet been formally
approved, "it seems improbable to me that we will do a serious search
for life on Mars and not do this test." |